SB 54 vs SB 343: what each law requires

SB 343 governs recyclability claims and labels, while SB 54 is the packaging EPR law that sets producer obligations. SB 54 uses the same recyclability determinations as SB 343 for producer obligations, so one recyclability decision can affect both.

This guide compares the two laws side by side and explains why brands need to track them together. It is part of our plain-English guide to California SB 54.

What does SB 343 require?

SB 343 governs recyclability claims and labels. In other words, it is about what a company may say about whether its packaging is recyclable. For the details of the claims rules and their dates, read the SB 343 bill text and check CalRecycle for current requirements.

What does SB 54 require?

SB 54 is the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act. It requires producers of covered packaging and plastic single-use food service ware sold into California to register, report and, from 2027, pay producer fees. It also sets 2032 targets: 100% of covered packaging recyclable or compostable, a 65% recycling rate for single-use plastic packaging and 25% source reduction of single-use plastic packaging.

Which questions does each law answer?

Keeping the questions separate makes it easier to see which team should answer which one, and where the answers overlap.

SB 54 vs SB 343: side-by-side comparison

SB 343 and SB 54 at a glance
TopicSB 343SB 54
What it governsRecyclability claims and labels.Producer obligations for covered packaging: registering, reporting and, from 2027, paying fees.
RecyclabilityGoverns recyclability claims and labels.Uses the same recyclability determinations for producer obligations.
Who administers itCheck CalRecycle for current requirements.CalRecycle, with CAA as the approved PRO.
Key datesCheck CalRecycle for current requirements.See the SB 54 timeline in our pillar guide.
Legal statusLegal challenges are pending.Legal challenges are pending.

How do the two laws connect?

The link is recyclability. SB 343 governs recyclability claims and labels, and SB 54 uses the same recyclability determinations for producer obligations. So a decision about whether a component is recyclable is not only a labeling question. It can also affect what you owe as a producer.

A concrete example: if a supplier adds a coating to a component, the change can alter how that component is treated. Your team would want to know about it both for the label and for your SB 54 data, which is why accurate supplier specs matter to both.

Who owns each law inside your company?

Labels and claims often sit with marketing, packaging or regulatory teams, while producer reporting sits with sustainability, compliance or operations. Because both laws use the same recyclability determinations, those teams should work from one shared component record, so a change made for one purpose does not surprise the other.

Why do brands need to track both?

What should your team do now?

  1. List the recyclability claims you make on packaging sold into California.
  2. List the components behind each claim, with material, coating or layers and weight.
  3. Check the claims against the current requirements, starting from CalRecycle.
  4. Make sure the same component data feeds your SB 54 records.
  5. Agree who is told when a supplier changes a material or a coating.

Are there open legal questions?

Legal challenges involving SB 343 and SB 54 are pending, and the outcomes could change obligations. This guide does not predict how they will be resolved. CalRecycle’s SB 54 page is the place to check for current status.

Sources

Last updated: November 2026

This guide is general information, not legal advice. Confirm current requirements with CalRecycle and CAA.